DOI: 10.1142/s0218927526500070 ISSN: 0218-9275

Competing in the Global Sports Footwear Industry

Charley Qianlei Chen, Sunny Li Sun

This case study offers a comprehensive analysis of the contemporary global athletic footwear market, illustrating how the shifting marketing strategies, distribution channel configurations, and evolving consumer preferences have refined the traditional competitive playbook. It identifies and contrasts the strategic maneuvers of three groups of global brands: dominant giants (Nike and Adidas), resilient legacy players (Puma, ASICS, and Under Armour), and fast-growing challenger brands (Hoka, ON, Li-Ning, and Anta).

Through a lens of global business development, the case study highlights the excellence and balance in product and marketing strategies that sports brands must constantly and delicately harness to expand and sustain their footwear market shares. This includes the balance between superior athletic performance (e.g., innovation in footwear cushioning technology) and lifestyle resonance (e.g., national culture and retro designs) in product strategy, as well as the balance in the brand’s distribution strategy, between the high-margin direct-to-customer (DTC) sales model and the wide-reaching, partnership-based wholesale retail network.

The narrative explores how market leaders could stumble when over-relying on a single strategy — such as Nike’s aggressive pivoting in 2020 to digital DTC and data-driven performance marketing at the expense of its superior brand storytelling. Conversely, it shows how agile underdogs, such as Hoka and ON, had grown rapidly in the global market since circa 2010 by initially capturing high-end niche markets and progressively offering innovative footwear technologies. The study also discusses the developing paths of legacy sports brands, for example, Puma and Under Armour opting to persist in very different strategies on product portfolio and marketing mix. In addition, two local brands going global from an emerging market (Li-Ning and Anta from China) were examined in terms of how they leveraged domestic culture and aggressive international multi-brand acquisitions to challenge Western dominance in the sports goods market.

More from our Archive