Comparison of urodynamic outcomes by hysterectomy technique: A cross-sectional study
Raymundo A. Munoz, José M. Arroyo, Alfonzo E. Munoz, Joel Herrera, Marcos Iglesias, Marlene Muñiz, Salvador Pizarro
Although hysterectomy significantly alters pelvic anatomy, its long-term effects on bladder function, pelvic floor integrity, and urethral sphincter activity remain controversial. Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings, often limited by surgical variability, heterogeneous study populations, and differing definitions of detrusor hypocontractility. This study aimed to determine whether urodynamic results—specifically, detrusor contractility, urethral sphincter function, and pelvic floor function—differ according to hysterectomy technique. We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional analysis of urodynamic studies from women who underwent abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic hysterectomy in Mexico between 2019 and 2024. Standardized thresholds derived from established urodynamic references were used to evaluate detrusor function, sphincter strength, and pelvic floor integrity. ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and chi-square tests were applied (