Comparison of Shape-Dependent Internal Blast Responses of Enclosed Circular and Square Reinforced Concrete Structures Under Progressive Charge Weight Conditions Using Finite Element Analysis

Enclosed reinforced concrete structures subjected to internal blast loading represent a critical safety concern in infrastructure applications where detonations may occur within confined spaces. Although circular cross-sections have been widely adopted for blast-resistant containment structures, systematic quantitative comparisons of internal blast responses between circular and square enclosed configurations under progressive charge weight conditions remain limited. LS-DYNA finite element simulations are conducted under four trinitrotoluene (TNT) charge weight conditions ranging from 1200 to 2500 kg, and the failure-inducing blast load is defined as the minimum charge weight at which continuous concrete element deletion first occurs in the roof or side-wall region. In this study, the failure-inducing blast load is interpreted as an erosion-based comparative indicator under the adopted empirical blast-loading framework rather than as an absolute real-world confined-blast failure threshold. The roof failure-inducing blast load is identical for both structures at 1200 kg, whereas the side-wall failure-inducing blast loads are 2500 kg for the circular structure and 1500 kg for the square structure, indicating approximately 67% higher side-wall blast resistance in the circular structure. This difference is attributed to the membrane action of the curved wall, which redistributes internal blast-induced lateral pressure along the circumferential direction and limits out-of-plane deformation. Under the 2500-kg condition, the peak side-wall displacement of the square structure is 161.6% higher than that of the circular structure, whereas its peak roof displacement is 33.3% lower. Axial strains at all reinforcement locations remain within the elastic range, confirming that concrete damage is governed by the low tensile capacity of concrete rather than reinforcement yielding.