Comparison of blood culture contamination rates with standard practice versus two blood diversion devices at a single institution
Casey Vieni, Michele Legried, Jill Mainella, Kelly Bute, Linda Backus, Priya Sampathkumar, Audrey N. Schuetz, Robin Patel, Brad S. KaronABSTRACT
Blood culture contamination can lead to false-positive blood culture results, potentially contributing to increased costs and unneeded antibiotic utilization. Initial specimen diversion devices (ISDD) have been proposed to reduce blood culture contamination rates. A single-center, observational study conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester compared blood culture contamination rates using Steripath or Kurin ISDDs versus standard blood culture collection protocols. Over 255 phlebotomists were trained in the use of the ISDDs, with 31,215 blood cultures, 410 of which were contaminated, collected from adults in the emergency department and inpatient wards. Baseline contamination rates were 1.29%–2.53% with standard collection methods. The Steripath ISDD with direct-to-media inoculation of blood culture bottles (Steripath-DTM) reduced blood culture contamination compared to standard practice (0.34% vs. 1.43%, respectively,
IMPORTANCE
We conducted a very large, real-world study of two blood diversion devices to determine whether either would meet goals for reduced blood culture contamination and a high rate of utilization by phlebotomists.