DOI: 10.4103/jcde.jcde_333_26 ISSN: 2950-4716

Comparison of activated versus nonactivated irrigation on bacterial load reduction and postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial

Venkat Ramana Reddy, Charu Thanvi, Ekadashi Rajni, Deepak Raisingani, Ashwini B. Prasad, Harshit Srivastava
Show PDF Cite

Abstract

Background:

For effective disinfection of the root canal system, irrigant activation enhances antimicrobial efficacy and reduces postoperative pain.

Aim:

To compare activated and nonactivated irrigation techniques in reducing bacterial load and postoperative pain in single-rooted teeth with pulpal necrosis.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty-four patients aged 18–55 years, single-rooted necrotic teeth were randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 18) based upon different irrigation techniques: Group A–side-vented needle, Group B–passive ultrasonic, and Group C–air-sonic. The irrigation protocol followed for all groups was 2.5%sodium hypochlorite, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine. Before collection of the sample, 0.3% L-lecithin and 3% Tween-80 were used as irrigant neutralizers. Sampling: (S1) before access opening, (S2) after access opening, before cleaning and shaping, (S3) after cleaning and shaping. Sample collection by sterile paper points and inoculated onto agar plates; the colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified using a colony counter. Postoperative pain was recorded by patient marking on the provided VAS chart at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data analyzation by one-way analysis of variance, Chi-square test, and Bonferroni post hoc analysis.

Results:

At S1, the mean CFU score was 0.00 in all groups; at S2, 1.00 across all groups. After irrigation (S3), mean CFU scores were 0.53 in Group A, 0.12 in Group B, and 0.31 in Group C, with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.041). Postoperative mean pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h were 2.944, 2.111, and 0.778 in Group A; 2.500, 1.556, and 0.278, in Group B; and 2.889, 1.867, and 0.433 in Group C. Statistically significant differences were observed at 12, 24, and 48 h ( P = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Passive ultrasonic irrigation was the most effective technique due to superior irrigant activation at higher acoustic streaming and cavitation, assuring biofilm disruption, reducing bacterial load, and reducing postoperative pain score.

More from our Archive