DOI: 10.1177/10406387261466243 ISSN: 1040-6387
Comparison of 2 commercial antibody ELISA kits for identification of high proviral load carrier cattle in strategic control of bovine leukemia virus infection
Takenori Arai, Saki Uehara, Sonoko Kondo, Takehisa Yamamoto, Tomomi Kanazawa, Aiko Yamamoto-Kinami, Kei-ichi Matsuda, Takashi Matsuzaki, Shinji Yamada, Hirokazu Hikono, Kenji Murakami
Bovine leukemia virus (BLV; family
Retroviridae
, taxon species
Deltaretrovirus bovleu
) infection poses a serious threat to cattle health, and the strategic identification of high proviral-load (PVL) carriers is essential for disease control. We evaluated 2 commercial ELISA kits for the detection of BLV antibodies and indirect identification of high-PVL cattle (EBL ELISA [Nippon Gene] and Leukosis Serum X2 [Idexx]) using a cross-sectional survey of 155 cattle from 17 farms. Based on our quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) results, we classified tested cattle into non-infected, low-PVL (<400 copies/10 ng DNA), and high-PVL (≥400 copies/10 ng DNA) groups. The 2 ELISA kits had excellent agreement (κ = 0.97; 95% CI [0.93, 1.00]) and moderate correlation (
r
= 0.617). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the Leukosis Serum X2 ELISA performed better than the EBL ELISA at identifying high-PVL cattle, with a higher area under the curve (0.840 vs. 0.785) and higher sensitivity (89.7% vs. 84.6%) and specificity (66.4% vs. 56.9%). Both ELISA kits had a moderate ability to distinguish high-level BLV-infected cattle. Our results suggest that a 2-step screening concept could be valuable: ELISA screening followed by confirmatory qPCR testing to identify cattle with a high PVL.