Comparative Study of Micro-Detail Replication in SAE H13 Tool Steel: Powder Hot Embossing vs. Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing
Elsa Wellenkamp Sequeiros, Fernando Ye Lin, Manuel Fernando Vieira, José Manuel CostaMicro-structured SAE H13 tool steel inserts for polymer injection molding require accurate replication of sub-millimeter features while retaining adequate densification and heat-treatment response. This study compared two powder-based routes on the same hemispherical insert containing pyramidal features of approximately 0.145 mm base width: hot embossing (HE) of water-atomized SAE H13 powder (supplier d50 = 5.7 µm, irregular morphology) compounded with a commercial M1 binder, and material extrusion (MEX) of a commercial gas-atomized SAE H13 filament processed on a Markforged Metal X. Rheological screening selected a 57:43 vol% powder-to-binder ratio for the in-house HE feedstock, and DSC/TGA measurements defined two-step debinding windows. The best HE conditions were 220 °C, 8 MPa, and 45 min for the in-house mixture, and 210 °C, 8 MPa, and 30 min for the granulated commercial filament; the latter showed a 0.15% linear deviation from the silicone replica diameter among the best-rated samples. Under the tested commercial MEX configuration, the pyramidal features were not resolved because the 0.40 mm deposition line width exceeded the target feature base width, causing the slicer to omit the sub-line-width geometry. The defect populations differed qualitatively: HE specimens showed porosity and local cracking associated with powder morphology and pressureless sintering, whereas MEX specimens showed build-direction-aligned inter-raster voids associated with the toolpath. Microhardness and tensile data are therefore interpreted as process-history-specific results rather than as a direct route ranking, because sintering conditions were not uniform across all specimens. The study defines an experimentally bound process-selection limit for SAE H13 micro-tooling: HE remains preferable for sub-nozzle surface features, whereas MEX remains attractive for macro-scale geometric freedom, if resolution, densification, and post-sintering consolidation are addressed.