DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000051168 ISSN: 0025-7974

Comparative perioperative and follow-up outcomes of three laparoscopic reconstructive procedures for pediatric duplex kidney

Hongchao Chai, Jingru Wang, Jingtao Li, Yun Zhou

This study aimed to describe and compare perioperative characteristics, postoperative recovery, complications, and observed follow-up outcomes among children undergoing 3 laparoscopic renal-preserving reconstructive procedures selected according to anatomical and functional characteristics. This retrospective cohort study included children with duplex kidney who underwent laparoscopic renal-preserving reconstructive surgery between January 2016 and December 2025. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the surgical procedure performed. Baseline characteristics, preoperative anatomical findings, surgical indications, operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, complications, and follow-up outcomes were compared among the groups. Additional pairwise comparison was performed between pelvic-level end-to-side ureteroureterostomy (UU) and upper-pole ureteral bladder reimplantation. A total of 91 children were included: 29 who underwent renal pelvic-level upper-pole ureter to lower-pole renal pelvis anastomosis, 36 who underwent pelvic-level end-to-side UU, and 26 who underwent upper-pole ureteral bladder reimplantation. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. Significant differences were observed in anatomical features and surgical indications. Markedly dilated or obstructed upper-pole ureters were more frequent in the renal pelvic-level ureteropyelostomy and pelvic-level end-to-side UU groups, whereas distal upper-pole ureteral abnormality and reflux-related indications were more common in the upper-pole ureteral bladder reimplantation group. Operative time differed significantly among the 3 groups, with the shortest time observed in the pelvic-level end-to-side UU group. Estimated blood loss was also lowest in this group. Pairwise comparison showed that pelvic-level end-to-side UU was associated with significantly shorter operative time and lower estimated blood loss than upper-pole ureteral bladder reimplantation. Laparoscopic renal pelvic-level upper-pole ureter to lower-pole renal pelvis anastomosis, pelvic-level end-to-side UU, and upper-pole ureteral bladder reimplantation appear to be feasible and effective renal-preserving reconstructive procedures for pediatric duplex kidney when selected according to anatomical and functional characteristics. Pelvic-level end-to-side UU was associated with shorter operative time and lower estimated blood loss than upper-pole ureteral bladder reimplantation when a suitable ipsilateral recipient ureter was available. No statistically significant between-group differences were detected in postoperative recovery, complications, or the measured follow-up outcomes. These findings should be interpreted in the context of anatomy-based procedure selection rather than as evidence of equivalent effectiveness.

More from our Archive