Comparative performance of stool preprocessing methods for Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: optimizing diagnostic yield in elderly populations
Hung-Ling Huang, Chou-Jui Lin, Wei-Chang Huang, Chih-Bin Lin, Cheng-Hui Wang, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Meng-Rui Lee, Chou-Chin Lan, Tzu-Tao Chen, Ching-Sheng Hung, Li-Na Lee, Jann-Yuan Wang, Ming-Chih Yu, Yi-Wen Huang, Chih-Hsin LeeABSTRACT
Diagnostic delays in elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) frequently arise from difficulty obtaining adequate sputum specimens, yet evidence supporting stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) as a noninvasive alternative in adults remains limited. This prospective multicenter study conducted in Taiwan enrolled 483 participants, including 398 aged ≥65 years, of whom 167 had PTB, and 316 did not. Three stool preprocessing approaches were compared: homogenization and centrifugation (Stool-I), bead beating and chemical lysis (Stool-II), and a centrifuge-free protocol (Stool-III), with diagnostic performance assessed against a composite reference standard (CRS) and respiratory mycobacterial culture. Sputum Xpert Ultra achieved an overall sensitivity of 85.6% and specificity of 98.4%, while respiratory smear and culture were positive in 66.5% and 86.8% of PTB cases, respectively. Among stool preprocessing methods, Stool-I demonstrated the highest sensitivity, significantly outperforming Stool-III (73.1% vs 62.3%;
IMPORTANCE
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading infectious cause of death worldwide, and diagnosis in elderly patients is often limited by inadequate sputum production and the need for invasive respiratory sampling. This study demonstrates that stool, a simple and noninvasive specimen, can be used with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra to reliably detect