Comparative Outcomes of Single-Stage Fontan Procedure Versus Staged Fontan Following Glenn Procedure in Single-Ventricle Patients
Panat Kittisit, Janewit Wanichwatphibun, Mueanthep Chomvilailuk, Chayatat Sirinawin, Jule Namchaisiri, Vichai BenjacholamasObjectives
The role of single-stage Fontan completion, performed without a preceding bidirectional Glenn, remains controversial in late-presenting patients and resource-limited settings. We compared early and midterm outcomes of single-stage and staged Fontan.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing Fontan completion at a tertiary congenital cardiac center between January 2003 and December 2025. Cohorts were grouped by whether Fontan was direct (single-stage) or after prior bidirectional Glenn (staged). Primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival; secondary endpoints included complications, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and midterm survival.
Results
Of the 118 patients (single-stage n = 66; staged
Conclusion
Despite less favorable baseline hemodynamics, early and midterm outcomes after single-stage Fontan were comparable to staged Fontan. Single-stage Fontan is a reasonable option for appropriately evaluated late-presenting patients in resource-constrained settings; multicenter studies are required to refine selection criteria.