DOI: 10.58559/ijes.1978490 ISSN: 2717-7513
Comparative MPPT performance of particle swarm optimization, grey wolf optimizer, and crested porcupine optimizer under partial shading conditions
Şura Tutcu, Mustafa Şeker In this study, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Crested Porcupine Optimizer (CPO) algorithms were comparatively evaluated for global maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems under standard test and partial shading conditions. The MATLAB/Simulink model consists of four series-connected 250 W PV modules, bypass diodes, a boost DC–DC converter, a PWM generator, and an MPPT controller that directly determines the duty cycle of the converter. The algorithms were tested under three operating scenarios: standard test conditions, mild partial shading, and severe partial shading. To ensure a fair comparison, identical PV system parameters, converter settings, duty-cycle limits, and a common true GMPP reference were used for all algorithms. The performance of each method was assessed using steady-state average power, common-reference-based MPPT efficiency, settling time, steady-state power oscillation, and energy yield. Under standard test conditions, PSO showed the most balanced performance in terms of tracking accuracy and low oscillation, achieving a steady-state power of 998.972 W. Under mild partial shading conditions, CPO provided the best combined performance, with a steady-state power of 485.000 W, a power oscillation of 0.000055%, and a settling time of 0.15273 s. Under severe partial shading conditions, GWO achieved the steady-state power closest to the common GMPP reference, with 363.798 W, whereas PSO provided the fastest response and the lowest steady-state oscillation. The results indicate that no single algorithm is superior under all operating conditions. Therefore, the most suitable MPPT method should be selected by jointly considering tracking accuracy, convergence speed, steady-state stability, and application-specific requirements.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca02008 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Lower-C
2
Property F. H. Clarke, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13044 2026
Characterizations of Prox-Regular Sets in Uniformly Convex Banach Spaces Frédéric Bernard, Lionel Thibault, Nadia Zlateva
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca15047 2026
Brøndsted-Rockafellar Property and Maximality of Monotone Operators Representable by Convex Functions in Non-Reflexive Banach Spaces Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16027 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Exterior Sphere Condition Chadi Nour, Ron J. Stern, Jean Takche
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16053 2026
A New Old Class of Maximal Monotone Operators Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13045 2026
Maximal Monotonicity via Convex Analysis Jonathan Borwein
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca08009 2026
Variational Inequalities and Regularity Properties of Closed Sets in Hilbert Spaces Giovanni Colombo, Vladimir V. Goncharov
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca17060 2026
Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for Non-Autonomous Complementarity Dynamical Systems Bernard Brogliato, Lionel Thibault
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca01001 2026
Variational Sum of Monotone Operators H. Attouch, J.-B. Baillon, M. Théra
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca22017 2026
Weak Convexity of Sets and Functions in a Banach Space Grigorii E. Ivanov