Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of C-MAC™, McGrath MAC™ Videolaryngoscopes, and the Direct Miller Laryngoscope for Neonatal Intubation under General Anesthesia
Toko Nem, Nidhi Agrawal, Anju Gupta, Ridhima Sharma, Ripon ChoudharyAbstract
Background:
Neonatal endotracheal intubation remains technically challenging due to small airway dimensions and limited glottic visualization. Identifying the most effective device and technique to secure the airway is crucial. Video laryngoscopes (VLs) have been introduced to enhance visualization and improve intubation success. Considering the evolution of VL designs for pediatric use, this prospective, randomized trial compared two VLs with the conventional Miller Direct laryngoscopy (DL).
Materials and Methods:
Ninety neonates were randomly allocated into three equal groups (
Results:
The median (interquartile range [IQR]) total intubation time was shortest with the C-MAC VL VL (27 s, IQR = 25–29.75 s), followed by the McGrath MAC VL (29 s, IQR = 28–30 s;
Conclusions:
All devices were effective for neonatal intubation, but the C-MAC VL provided better glottic visualization and shorter intubation time, underscoring its potential usefulness in neonatal airway management.