DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.1991896 ISSN: 2636-8579
Comparative evaluation of large language models in treatment decision-making for skeletal class II malocclusion using clinical and cephalometric prompts
Beril Erdil, Samet Özden Aims: To evaluate the performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok in selecting among camouflage treatment, functional treatment, and orthognathic surgery for patients with skeletal class II malocclusion and to compare their classifications with expert orthodontist consensus.Methods: This retrospective comparative decision-accuracy study included a balanced sample of 45 patients, comprising 15 cases in each treatment category based on the unanimous agreement of three specialist orthodontists. Standardized scenarios containing anonymized demographic, clinical, and cephalometric data were submitted independently to the three large language models. Overall accuracy, class-specific F1 scores, and Cohen’s kappa coefficients were calculated. Differences in accuracy were evaluated using Cochran’s Q and exact McNemar tests with Bonferroni correction. The association between age and prediction accuracy was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.Results: Overall accuracy was 77.8% for Grok, 75.6% for ChatGPT, and 68.9% for Gemini. Grok and ChatGPT showed substantial agreement with expert consensus, with kappa values of 0.667 and 0.633, respectively, whereas Gemini showed moderate agreement (κ=0.533). All models achieved their highest F1 scores for functional treatment (0.929-1.000). Gemini frequently classified camouflage cases as requiring orthognathic surgery, whereas Grok tended to classify surgical cases as suitable for camouflage. Overall accuracy did not differ significantly among the models (Q=1.300; p=0.522). Incorrect ChatGPT predictions were associated with a higher age rank than correct predictions (p=0.006).Conclusion: The models demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement with expert orthodontists and performed particularly well in functional treatment cases. However, errors in distinguishing camouflage treatment from orthognathic surgery indicate that LLM-based classification should be interpreted cautiously and should not replace comprehensive clinical assessment.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1145/3845995 2026
A Survey of LLM-based Software Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applications Boyang Yang, Zijian Cai, Fengling Liu, Bach Le, Lingming Zhang, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Yang Liu, Haoye Tian
-
DOI: 10.1108/jrim-02-2024-0074 2026
Cutting-edge research in social media and interactive marketing: a
review and research agenda James W Peltier, Andrew J Dahl, Lauren Drury, Tracy Khan
-
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336 2026
Knowledge hiding – a systematic review and research
agenda Amitabh Anand, Florian Offergelt, Payal Anand
-
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230448 2026
The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing Diego R. Känzig
-
DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10115 2026
Part 1: Assessment of upright restraint of broilers for head-only electrical stunning Troy J. Gibson, Georgina Limon, Shannon Campbell, Natalie Chancellor, Katharine A Fletcher, Paul Berry, Jeff Lines
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86 2026
MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86-r2.0 2026
Codebase release 2.0 for MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85 2026
svPITE: A Python package for the state-vector-based probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85-r1.1 2026
Codebase release 1.1 for svPITE Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.1177/02611929261494117 2026
The World Medical Association’s
Declaration of Helsinki
and
Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research
: Why reliable and valid preclinical evidence and Natalie Anderson, Jane Kotzmann, Rachel Smith, Kathrin Herrmann