Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomics for Treatment of Depression
Andrew A. Nierenberg, Masoud Kamali, Dustin J. Rabideau, Jonathan E. Alpert, Warren D. Taylor, Samantha Pegg, Audrey R. Stromberg, Kedie Pintro, Zainab O. Soetan, Nur Akpolat, Saee Chitale, Amrutha Garimella, Ingrid R. Hsu, Hadi Kobaissi, Louisa G. SylviaPurpose/Background:
Pharmacogenomics (PGx), or the use of genetic information to assess drug-gene interactions, is an important step toward precision medicine. It is unclear if clinician use of PGx yields better outcomes for their patients. This study compared the effectiveness of combinatorial PGx-guided plus guideline-informed treatment (PGx+GIT) with guideline-informed treatment (GIT) alone to improve well-being in individuals with major depressive disorder.
Methods/Procedures:
Eligible participants (N=201) were randomized to PGx+GIT or GIT alone. PGx was measured with the proprietary GeneSight combinatorial test. PGx+GIT participant clinicians received test results within 2 business days to inform decisions about medication changes. Participants completed the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and PROMIS Profile physical functioning and social roles and activity domains every 2 weeks for 2 months and then every 2 months for the remaining 10 months. Monthly medication changes operationalized as necessary clinical adjustments were tracked with the medication recommendation tracking form.
Findings/Results:
Both groups improved average well-being over the 12-month study period (model-based change in WHO-5 per log (week) [95% CI]: 4.1 [3.3, 5.0] PGx+GIT and 4.8 [4.0, 5.5] GIT). PGx+GIT did not result in superior improvement in well-being (model-based difference [95% CI]: −0.6 [−1.8, 0.5],
Implications/Conclusions:
These data suggest PGx+GIT was not superior to GIT alone, possibly due to a ceiling effect of GIT, or PGx did not yield better results.