Comparative analysis of various infection models to provide methodological insights for the characterization of new antivirulence drugs to fight antibioresistance
Delphine Cormontagne, Lucie Lebreuilly, Constance Porrini, Seav-Ly Tran, Nalini RamaraoABSTRACT
Bacterial infections remain a major global health burden, amplified by the rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Among priority pathogens, the ESKAPEE group represents a critical threat due to their high prevalence in healthcare-associated infections, and their capacity to acquire multidrug resistance. Antivirulence strategies, aiming at disarming pathogens rather than inhibiting their growth, constitute a promising alternative to conventional antibiotics. Their development, however, is hindered by the lack of suitable experimental models to evaluate virulence and antivirulence efficacy. Here, we establish complementary
IMPORTANCE
Bacterial infections remain a major public health challenge, worsened by the rapid rise of antimicrobial resistance. Among the most concerning pathogens are the ESKAPEE bacteria, which frequently cause hospital-acquired infections and are often resistant to multiple antibiotics. Antivirulence strategies offer promising alternatives to traditional treatments by disarming bacteria rather than killing them, potentially reducing the risk of resistance. However, progress in this field has been limited by the lack of reliable models to measure bacterial virulence and evaluate antivirulence compounds. In this study, we developed complementary models to better assess bacterial pathogenicity and treatment efficacy. We created an