Comment on “Crossing disciplinary boundaries: motivations, challenges, and enablers for early career marine researchers moving from natural to social sciences” by Shellock et al . (2023)

Abstract

Natural scientists in marine science recognize that social science is useful for studying marine sustainability issues, which often encompass both material and cultural dimensions. That is why natural scientists, especially early career researchers, are transitioning to social science. Shellock et al. have reflected on this transition, identified the challenges involved, and provided tips for the transition. In our reply, we critically engage with this article. We argue that the transition from the natural to the social sciences exhibits a double standard that devalues the social sciences. We outline three reasons why the transition is underestimated: the notion of subjectivity, false familiarity with the social world of social scientists, and acceptance of lower scientific standards. Furthermore, we formulate recommendations on how interdisciplinarity—collaboration or transition—can succeed, including establishing interdisciplinary degree programs, creating dedicated spaces for interdisciplinary collaboration, and actively seeking out social scientists, formal training, and hands-on practice. We aim to contribute to the improvement of marine social science.