Cogent-Adversary: Cognitive-State Assessment and Adaptive Control for Dual-Agent Tutoring in Education
Zhonghua Sun, Siyu Chen, Mei BieLarge language models (LLMs) have expanded the capabilities of intelligent tutoring systems, but adaptive regulation of instructional challenge and control of domain-specific factual drift remain difficult. We propose Cogent-Adversary, a dual-agent tutoring framework that combines cognitive-state-informed adaptive control (CODA) with Knowledge-Graph-Grounded Adversarial Reasoning and an adversarial consistency check (KGAR–ACCL). The framework was evaluated in a two-week stratified randomized pre-test–post-test study with a one-week delayed assessment at one Chinese university. A total of 78 students were randomized to four tutoring conditions, and 72 completed all sessions. In the primary T1 analyses, the CODA-adaptive condition was associated with higher adjusted knowledge and domain-specific reasoning scores than the single-agent condition (Hedges’ g=2.02 and 2.87, respectively), while participant-clustered models indicated lower factual-error odds than the fixed and rule-based adaptive conditions. Given the short, single-site design and self-developed outcomes, these unusually large effects should be interpreted cautiously. Post hoc offline replays were exploratory only. The findings therefore provide preliminary proof-of-concept evidence for dynamically regulated, knowledge-grounded adversarial tutoring.