Clinical Outcomes of the Canine Bypass Anchorage Technique for Severe Maxillary Bone Deficiency: A Case Report Series

Background/Objectives: Advanced implant anchorage techniques are increasingly used to manage severe maxillary bone deficiency and to avoid extensive bone augmentation procedures. This case series report aimed to describe the canine bypass anchorage technique and to evaluate the short- to medium-term clinical outcomes and survival of implants placed using this approach. Materials and Methods: Thirteen patients presenting with missing maxillary premolars or posterior segments and insufficient alveolar bone height for conventional axial implant placement were treated using the canine bypass technique. A total of 19 long one-piece implants were inserted palatally to the canine root, engaging distant cortical bone of the nasal cavity and/or palatal alveolar process. Pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations were performed to assess implant positioning and anchorage. Patients were followed up to 3.5 years. Results: The mean follow-up period was 26.1 ± 10.8 months. Nasal cortical anchorage was achieved in 84.2% of implants, and palatal cortical anchorage in 73.7%; both anchorage types were obtained simultaneously in 57.9% of cases. The mean distance between the implant and canine root was 1.27 ± 1.4 mm (range: −1.0 to 4.5 mm), including cases of direct implant–tooth contact and periodontal ligament space transgression. All implants remained functional throughout the observation period, yielding a cumulative survival rate of 100%. Canine pulp vitality was preserved in all non-endodontically treated teeth. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this case series report, the canine bypass anchorage technique appears to be a feasible and minimally invasive treatment option for maxillary rehabilitation with implant-supported restoration in selected patients with severe bone deficiency, potentially allowing avoidance of sinus augmentation procedures. Further prospective studies with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm the long-term safety, predictability, and clinical applicability of this approach.