Clinical Outcomes of Breast-Involved Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Real-World Study with Insights into CNS Prophylaxis
Thi Thu Huong Nguyen, Thi Yen Le, Thanh Tung Nguyen, Thanh Long Nguyen, Xuan Dai Nguyen, Tuan Anh Pham, Anh Tu Do, Thi Thanh Ha Lai, Van Quang LeThis study evaluated clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and CNS relapse patterns in patients with breast-involved diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a rare extranodal presentation with limited real-world data. We conducted a retrospective study on 33 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast-involved DLBCL treated from 2019 to 2024. All patients received R-CHOP. Baseline CNS screening—including neurological examination, fundoscopy, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis—was routinely performed. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) was offered as CNS prophylaxis after completion of systemic therapy based on multidisciplinary team evaluation and clinician–patient shared decision-making according to institutional treatment protocols. Median age was 52.6 years; 84.8% had ECOG 0. Non-GCB subtype predominated (84.8%), and Ki-67 >70% was present in 69.7%. The overall response rate was 90.9%, with 84.8% complete responses. At a median follow-up of 44 months, 5-year Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were 84.8% and 66.7%. CNS relapse occurred in 4 of 6 patients (66.7%) without prophylaxis, all within 5–11 months after R-CHOP, whereas no CNS relapses were observed among prophylaxis recipients (p < 0.001), although this observation should be interpreted with extreme caution given the very small non-prophylaxis subgroup (n = 6), limited statistical power, and non-randomized treatment allocation. Exploratory analyses suggested that bulky disease was associated with inferior OS. R-CHOP achieved high response rates and favorable long-term outcomes in breast-involved DLBCL. The absence of CNS relapse among HD-MTX prophylaxis recipients, contrasted with a high relapse rate in those without prophylaxis, provides only a hypothesis-generating observation that requires confirmation in larger prospective studies; this warrants further investigation of the role of systemic CNS prophylaxis.