DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115274 ISSN: 2044-6055

Clinical indicators associated with pain trajectories in non-specific neck pain: a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective observational cohort to develop a clinical compass for personalised physiotherapy in primary care

Martine J Verwoerd, Richard A W Felius, Sophie Konings, Henri Kiers, Rob J E M Smeets

Objectives

To identify clinical indicators reflecting potentially treatment-modifiable prognostic factors associated with pain recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain and to develop a prototype clinical compass for visualising patient-specific profiles.

Design

Secondary analysis of data from a multicentre, prospective, observational prognostic cohort study, with a 6-month follow-up between January 2020 and March 2023.

Setting

30 physiotherapy primary care practices.

Participants

Patients with a new episode of non-specific neck pain.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months assessing pain intensity and biological, psychological and social factors. Questionnaire total scores and individual items reflecting selected potentially modifiable factors were tested separately as candidate indicators. Baseline and repeated indicators were examined as effect modifiers of pain trajectories using growth-curve models. Subsequently, modifiable clinical indicators were incorporated as effect modifiers to evaluate their influence on the trajectory of pain intensity over time. Non-redundant significant indicators were integrated into a prototype clinical compass.

Results

Data from 603 participants were collected. A quadratic growth-curve model best explained the longitudinal change of pain intensity. 24 clinical indicators were significantly associated with the trajectory of pain intensity over time. Two characteristics were excluded as they demonstrated high intercorrelation. Based on these findings, a clinical compass comprising 22 clinical indicators was developed to visualise patient-specific profiles.

Conclusions

This study provides a prototype clinical compass that may inform prognostic reasoning in primary care physiotherapy, but further evaluation is needed before clinical implementation.

More from our Archive