Classification of Kombucha Using Nutri-Score and Nova Nutrition Rating Scales
Carlos Aulesa, Carmen GongoraKombucha, known for its probiotic properties, is prominent in the functional drinks market. However, its classification by various food rating platforms, including Nutri-Score and Nova, reveals a potential paradox. Brands may receive conflicting and contradictory ratings, causing confusion among consumers and experts alike. We conducted a statistical analysis of the global database of registered kombuchas from the OpenFoodFact app as of December 21, 2023. Our examination focused on the nutritional content and classification scales, Nutri-Score and Nova, among the 3179 kombucha brands worldwide. Examining the acquired database allows for a detailed statistical analysis of 455 kombuchas evaluated using both scales, Nutri-Score and Nova. The Cohen’s kappa concordance coefficient between the two scales yielded a kappa value of 0.0725, indicating a modest level of agreement. We observed a 53% agreement rate and a 47% disagreement rate among the scores of each. Our in-depth analysis of the 47% of disagreements identified a subgroup comprising 28% of organic or biological kombuchas with contradictory and paradoxical classifications and another subgroup of 19% of the kombuchas classified as ultra-processed products, in this case with complementary classifications rather than paradoxical. These findings underscore the necessity for introducing novel food classifications in today’s landscape, with a comprehensive evaluation framework to provide consumers with accurate and meaningful information about food.