Classification of Fish Pond Soils in Soil Classification Systems
Besarion Meskhi, Dmitry Rudoy, Sergey Gorbov, Andrey Polyakov, Mary Odabashyan, Arkady Mirzoyan, Svetlana Studennikova, Denis KozyrevThe classification position of substrates forming on the beds of aquaculture ponds remains a poorly resolved issue at the intersection of pedology, limnology, and aquaculture science. We examine how major international and national soil classification systems—the USDA Soil Taxonomy, the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB), the German Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung, the Australian Soil Classification (ASC), the Russian Soil Classification, and the classification systems of Brazil and China—approach the systematics of subaqueous soils and their aquaculture analogues. A systematic literature search was conducted across the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases covering the period from 1953 to 2025. Our analysis reveals that Soil Taxonomy provides the most developed taxonomic framework through specialized suborders (Wassents and Wassists), while the WRB offers the greatest flexibility via its qualifier system (subaquatic, limnic, and gleyic). The German classification uniquely assigns subaqueous soils to the highest taxonomic level (division) with a substantive typology that is directly applicable to pond substrates. The Australian classification contributes a three-part sulfidic material typology of practical significance for pond management. The Russian and Brazilian systems currently lack formal taxa for subaqueous soils, although recent proposals (e.g., Aquazems) may address this gap. The Chinese paddy soil model offers a conceptual bridge between subaqueous pedology and aquaculture. No existing system adequately addresses the specific anthropogenic impacts of aquaculture management on pond soil formation. Permanently inundated little-disturbed ponds fall within the subaqueous soil concept, whereas intensively managed, frequently drained or dredged ponds are better treated as anthropogenic soils with a subaqueous phase. We recommend the WRB (4th edition, 2022) as the most suitable framework for current classification of aquaculture pond soils while acknowledging that a multi-system approach may ultimately prove most effective. These findings carry particular relevance for countries of the former Soviet Union (CIS), where extensive pond aquaculture is practiced but pond substrates remain outside formal pedological classification.