Circulating Non-Coding RNAs as Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for Early Detection of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Diagnostic Performance to Clinical Translation
Ivayla Kuleva, Stoyan Stoyanov, Maria Tsvetkova, Nikoleta Ivanova, Dzheni Cherneva, Tsonka Dimitrova, Galina YanevaBackground/Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and molecularly heterogeneous breast cancer subtype for which early detection remains clinically important. Circulating non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), are being investigated as blood-based biomarkers. This narrative review evaluates the clinical evidence for circulating ncRNAs as liquid-biopsy biomarkers for early TNBC detection, focusing on stage I–II disease, diagnostic performance, comparator selection, and validation. Methods: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2009 and October 2026 were identified primarily through PubMed/MEDLINE searches, supplemented by Google Scholar searches, with particular attention to disease stage, comparator populations, diagnostic performance, and validation status. Results: Among the ncRNA classes reviewed, circulating miRNAs provide the most directly relevant, although still limited, clinical evidence for early-stage TNBC detection, whereas evidence for lncRNAs and circRNAs remains predominantly exploratory and insufficiently validated for early-stage detection. Translation is limited by small, heterogeneous cohorts, analytical variability, and insufficient independent and prospective validation. Conclusions: High diagnostic accuracy in selected cohorts does not establish clinical readiness. Standardized analytical workflows, independent multicenter validation, prospective evaluation in intended-use populations, and integration with imaging and clinical assessment are needed before circulating ncRNA signatures can be considered for clinical use.