DOI: 10.1177/03601293261464183 ISSN: 0360-1293

Beyond Functional Mobility: Psychosocial Adaptation as a Distinct Dimension of Lower Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Cigdem Cinar, Ömer Faruk Bucak, Nazire Bağatır, Muhsin Doran, Yusuf Çelik
Show PDF Cite

Background

Functional mobility alone may not fully reflect rehabilitation success after lower limb amputation. Patient-reported prosthetic satisfaction, psychosocial adaptation, and perceived functional competence may represent partially independent dimensions of recovery. This study investigated the multidimensional relationships among mobility, prosthesis-related satisfaction, and psychosocial adaptation in individuals with traumatic lower limb amputation.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study included 70 adults with traumatic lower limb amputation who were current prosthesis users. Participants underwent multidimensional assessment using K-level classification, Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Houghton Scale, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), SF-12, and Falls Efficacy Scale. Participants were categorized into lower activity (K1–K2) and higher activity (K3–K4) groups.

Results

The higher activity group demonstrated significantly better Houghton scores ( p  = 0.008), TUG performance ( p  < 0.001), TAPES disability scores ( p  < 0.001), prosthesis satisfaction ( p  = 0.008), SF-12 physical ( p  < 0.001), SF-12 mental ( p  < 0.001), and LCI-5 scores ( p  < 0.001). In contrast, TAPES psychosocial scores ( p  = 0.176) and fall efficacy ( p  = 0.062) did not significantly differ between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the strongest discriminative performance for the Houghton Scale (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.710–0.908) and LCI-5 (AUC = 0.802, 95% CI: 0.699–0.905), followed by SF-12 physical (AUC = 0.750) and SF-12 mental scores (AUC = 0.732). Hierarchical clustering suggested a dominant functional mobility cluster and a partially distinct psychosocial-prosthetic adaptation cluster.

Conclusion

K-level and mobility-based measures primarily reflect ambulatory capacity but do not fully capture psychosocial adaptation. Multidimensional assessment may better characterize rehabilitation success after lower limb amputation.

More from our Archive