Beyond carbon: what about the water footprint of surgical pathology departments?
Tanguy Fenouil, Béatrice Nadaud, Sylvain Guinde, Karine Hutin, Lucie Gaillot-Durand, Alexis TrecourtAbstract
Objectives
We assessed the water footprint of preparing standard (hematoxylin, phloxine, and saffron [HPS]) and special stains, routinely used in surgical pathology, with the aim of reducing water consumption without compromising the quality of the analysis.
Methods
The water footprint of HPS and special stains was first calculated using water meters and the number of stains prepared per day. Then, the quality of HPS stains at different tap positions and flow rates (35.4, 28.3, and 18.5 mL/s) was compared to reduce the tap flow rate (protocol optimization). Finally, the number of water liters saved using the optimized protocol was estimated.
Results
For automated HPS stains, the mean number of slides prepared per day was 545.8 (range, 310-851), and the mean amount of water consumed daily was 1003.8 L (range, 807-1286). This represented an average of 1.8 L per HPS slide. For special stains, the mean amount of water consumed daily was 236.3 L (range, 39-1167), representing between 20.1 and 21.2 L per slide, depending on the staining procedure (manual or automated). Then, when comparing the HPS stain according to different tap positions, no difference in stain quality was noticed. Finally, setting the tap flow rate at 28.3 mL/s for the automated HPS staining procedure allowed us to reduce water consumption from 1.8 to 1.5 L per HPS slide, representing a 16.7% reduction.
Conclusions
Reducing water consumption of staining procedures is feasible and easy to implement in practice without affecting the quality of the analyses.