DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.21937.2 ISSN: 2732-5121

Between EU objectives and national guidance: a documentary analysis of ESF+ funding for child and family services in Finland

Laura Ortju, Kati Honkanen, Elina Weckström
Show PDF Cite
Background The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) is the European Union’s (EU) primary instrument for investing in people and supporting the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights. This study explores, through selected documents, how the ESF+ funding in Finland contributes to the European Commission’s strategies for operationalising children’s rights, including the European Child Guarantee. The analysis focuses on funding calls under the national theme “Developing services for children, youth and families and promoting well-being towards equality”. The analysis is informed by a normative children’s rights perspective. Methods The study draws on the following documents: 1) the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child, 2) the Council recommendation establishing the European Child Guarantee, 3) the Finnish National Child Strategy Committee report, 4) the Innovation and Skills in Finland 2021–2027 programme, and 5) three funding calls. Results This study examined how ESF+ funding calls in Finland reflect strategic guidance from both EU-level and national frameworks, with a particular focus on children’s rights. The findings indicate that national documents introduce additional obligations—such as promoting family-friendliness in education and working life and enhancing equity and children’s perspectives in leisure activities—that go beyond EU-level strategies. However, certain EU commitments, notably those related to child-friendly justice and digital competence in family services, are not consistently reflected in the analysed national programming or funding calls. Conclusions The analysis suggests that national-level priorities may lead to differential emphasis on certain EU objectives in the operationalisation of ESF+ funding. Allocation decisions are influenced not only by shared strategic goals but also by domestic political agendas and demographic considerations. This raises concerns about strategic coherence and the visibility of children’s rights in funding processes. Documentary analysis of EU strategies can support better alignment between national programming and shared European goals, contributing to more equitable development of child and family services across Member States. The findings highlight the need for greater transparency in how children’s rights priorities are operationalised in funding calls.

More from our Archive