Basin-scale evaluation of the Noah-MP land surface model for runoff and snow generation in the Missouri River Basin: insights and recommendations for parameterization scheme selection
Eunsaem Cho, Eunsang Cho, Carrie Vuyovich, Bailing Li, Jennifer M. JacobsProcess-based land surface models, such as the Noah-Multiparameterization (Noah-MP) model, are widely used for large-scale hydrologic simulations because of their flexibility in selecting multiple parameterization schemes. However, limited guidance on choosing appropriate configurations constrains their reliability in representing runoff and snowmelt dynamics across diverse land-cover and snow conditions. This study evaluates the default and four alternative parameterization schemes in the Noah-MP land surface model, including Runoff and Groundwater (RUN), Surface Exchange Coefficient for Heat (SFC), Frozen Soil Permeability (INF), and Snow/Soil Temperature Time Scheme (STC), across 50 Hydro-Climate Data Networks (HCDNs) in the Missouri River Basin. Model performance was evaluated using USGS streamflow observations and snow water equivalent (SWE) estimates from the University of Arizona dataset for 2014–2023. Results showed that the alternative schemes improved runoff simulation compared to the default scheme through different approaches representing key hydrological and thermodynamic processes. Specifically, the RUN, SFC, INF, and STC experiments improved the Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) by 0.19, 0.38, 0.44, and 0.14, respectively in representative subbasins, through enhanced groundwater dynamics, reduced evapotranspiration bias, improved rapid runoff response, and more accurate SWE evolution. SWE evaluation further indicates that the STC experiment most effectively reduced SWE bias in snow-dominated subbasins, though improvements in SWE did not universally translate into better runoff simulation. These results highlight the importance of basin-specific parameterization schemes within Noah-MP to improve hydrological prediction and water management across diverse hydroclimatic regions. The findings further indicate optimal parameterization schemes for different climates, land cover, and snow regimes.