Authorship and citation trends in dementia research: A path to equitable career development for scientists
Jayalakshmi Viswanathan, Diana Karamacoska, Lokendra S. Thakur, Mouna Sawan, Angela Gomez‐Arboledas, Ines Moreno‐Gonzalez, C. Elizabeth Shaaban, Sadaf A. Milani, Giedre Milinkeviciute, Samantha M. Loi, Anika Wuestefeld, Sindhuja T. Govindarajan, Audrey Low, Giovanna Carello‐Collar, Hom L. Shreshta, Sunnie Kenowsky, Claudia K. Suemoto, Michelle M. Mielke, Shana D. StitesAbstract
INTRODUCTION
Women are increasingly entering the dementia research workforce, but they frequently fail to attain senior leadership positions in academia. Discrepancies in academic research outputs were investigated to guide equity‐focused policy recommendations.
METHODS
Bibliometrics was conducted on 400,482 original research articles (2003–2022) followed by surveying the AD/ADRD research community, to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate discrepancies in publication and authorship trends. In addition, an unsupervised learning algorithm was developed to analyze underlying relationships between author groups.
RESULTS
Male author gender was consistently predictive of better publication and citation metrics across all bibliometrics outcomes, with senior male authors outperforming all other subgroups and fewer senior female authors in most research areas. Female survey respondents reported more barriers, but comparable productivity and citation strategies as male authors.
DISCUSSION
Multi‐pronged approaches by stakeholders across institutions, funders, and journals are necessary to provide career support for early‐career scientists working to transition to senior research roles.