Audiologic Assessment and Management of Teprotumumab-Associated Ototoxicity: An Updated Narrative Review
John Williams, Alex Elkins, Alp Sarigul, Mary Frances Johnson, Charles E. BishopIntroduction: Teprotumumab (Tepezza®), an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) antagonist, is the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for thyroid eye disease (TED). While effective for reducing proptosis and inflammation, increasing post-marketing evidence has linked teprotumumab to auditory adverse events. IGF-1 signaling is essential for cochlear maintenance and neuroprotection; therefore, systemic IGF-1R inhibition presents a biologically plausible mechanism for ototoxicity. Despite growing recognition of these effects, no standardized approach exists for audiologic assessment or monitoring of patients receiving teprotumumab. This review aimed to (1) summarize proposed mechanisms and the reported spectrum of teprotumumab-related auditory effects, (2) evaluate current methods used to assess and monitor these patients, and (3) identify areas of consensus and ongoing uncertainty. Methods: An updated narrative review of the literature was conducting using PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar using Boolean strings targeting teprotumumab exposure and hearing-related outcomes. Studies from 2022 onward were identified using Boolean search strings targeting teprotumumab exposure and hearing-related outcomes. Peer-reviewed English language studies reporting audiometric findings were eligible for inclusion. Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Reported effects most commonly included bilateral high-frequency SNHL, tinnitus, and aural fullness, typically emerging after three to six infusions. Many cases demonstrated persistent deficits despite drug discontinuation. Baseline audiometric assessment was not uniformly reported across studies, and monitoring protocols varied considerably, with inconsistent incorporation of speech testing and immittance measures. Conclusions: Teprotumumab-associated ototoxicity is increasingly recognized and potentially irreversible. Current evidence is insufficient to guide standardized monitoring. Prospective studies are urgently needed to establish evidence-based audiologic surveillance protocols.