DOI: 10.3390/jcm15124793 ISSN: 2077-0383

Association of Triglyceride–Glucose Index with Angiographic Thrombus Burden in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Observational Study

Nikolaos Stalikas, Marios G. Bantidos, Efstratios Karagiannidis, Athina Nasoufidou, Sara Corradetti, Anthony Kechichian, Christos Kofos, Maria Fasoula, Matthaios Didagelos, Marios Sagris, Barbara Fyntanidou, Antonios Ziakas, Theodoros Karamitsos, Georgios Giannopoulos

Background: The triglyceride–glucose (TyG) index has emerged as a simple surrogate marker of insulin resistance and metabolic disruption. In the context of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), such disturbances have been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, more complex angiographic profiles, and microvascular complications. However, data on the association between TyG and intracoronary thrombus burden (TB) in STEMI remain limited. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we included consecutive STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The TyG index was calculated using the following formula: ln [fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/2]. TB was graded according to the modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (mTIMI) thrombus classification score after restoration of antegrade flow with a wire or small balloon when the culprit vessel was initially totally occluded. Patients were categorized as low-TB (LTB; mTIMI grades 1–3) and high-TB (HTB; mTIMI grade 4). The primary outcome was HTB; secondary outcomes were distal embolization and no-reflow. Associations between TyG and outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate incremental predictive value. Results: A total of 309 patients were analyzed. The TyG index was significantly higher in the HTB group compared with the LTB group (9.12 ± 0.62 vs. 8.92 ± 0.64, p = 0.004). In a stepwise multivariable model, TyG remained independently associated with HTB (adjusted odds ratio = 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.11–2.37; p = 0.014). Adding TyG to a baseline clinical model only numerically improved discrimination for HTB, as reflected by a small increase in ROC area under the curve. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a monotonic rise in the probability of HTB with higher TyG values. Higher TyG also showed non-significant trends toward increased odds of distal embolization and no-reflow. Conclusions: The TyG index was independently associated with HTB in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI and may serve as an accessible adjunctive marker for incremental risk stratification beyond conventional clinical and angiographic factors.

More from our Archive