Association of Obesity with Cardiovascular Procedures and In-Hospital Outcomes in Adults with Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Kirill Berezhnoi, Ilan Merdler, Adam Folman, Maguli Barel, Rami Abu-Fanne, Ariel Roguin, Ofer KoboBackground/Objectives: Obesity and diabetes mellitus coexist, but the association of obesity with invasive management and in-hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock is uncertain. We evaluated these associations among adults with diabetes mellitus. Methods: We performed a retrospective discharge-level analysis of the National Inpatient Sample for 2016–2021. Obesity was identified from ICD-10-CM codes. Survey-design logistic regression accounted for weights, strata, hospital clusters, and prespecified covariates. Results: The cohort comprised 19,399 discharges, representing 96,995 hospitalizations; 24.1% had obesity. Angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were more frequent with obesity, whereas percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was less frequent. After adjustment, obesity was associated with higher odds of angiography (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.21) and CABG (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.35–1.63), lower odds of PCI (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.97), and similar odds of circulatory support (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93–1.07). Adjusted odds were lower for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.95), in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.98), acute ischemic stroke (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64–0.95), and major bleeding (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76–0.98). Procedure adjustment attenuated mortality and major bleeding. Conclusions: Obesity was associated with a different invasive-management pattern and lower adjusted odds of several short-term outcomes, consistent with an apparent in-hospital obesity paradox in this high-risk population.