Assessment of Stress Perturbations Induced by Reservoir Loading and Their Compatibility with Reservoir-Triggered Seismicity: The Case of the Irapé Hydropower Plant, Brazil
Iarly Vanderlei da Silveira, Gilberto GomesReservoir-triggered seismicity (RTS) is commonly associated with stress perturbations induced by reservoir loading and pore-pressure diffusion within fractured rock masses. Shortly after the initial impoundment of the Irapé Hydropower Plant (Minas Gerais, Brazil), a sequence of induced earthquakes was recorded, providing an opportunity to investigate the compatibility between reservoir loading and the observed seismic response. This study presents a first-order hydromechanical assessment integrating finite element modelling, analytical elasticity solutions, and pore-pressure diffusion theory to evaluate the spatial distribution of stress perturbations and the characteristic diffusion times associated with reservoir impoundment. A two-dimensional elastic model was developed to simulate stress redistribution induced by the maximum reservoir load, while a parametric diffusion analysis was performed for representative hydraulic diffusivities and hypocentral depth scenarios between 1 and 6 km. Numerical results showed excellent agreement with the analytical elasticity solution (RMSE = 14.36 kPa, MAE = 11.08 kPa, mean relative error = 1.38%, and R2 = 0.999), supporting the reliability of the numerical model. The simulations indicate that vertical stress perturbations decrease from approximately 1.8–2.0 MPa immediately beneath the reservoir to about 0.01–0.1 MPa at kilometer-scale depths, where the recorded seismicity is presumed to occur. The diffusion analysis indicates that pore-pressure propagation to these depths generally requires substantially longer times than the interval between reservoir filling and the onset of seismic activity. Nevertheless, owing to uncertainties in hydraulic diffusivity, fracture connectivity, and hypocentral depth estimates, the diffusion results are interpreted as a first-order sensitivity analysis rather than a site-specific prediction. Overall, the results support the temporal compatibility and physical plausibility of rapid elastic stress redistribution as a potential triggering mechanism, while recognizing that the available geological and seismological data are insufficient to establish a direct causal relationship or demonstrate fault reactivation.