Assessing Environmental Impact, Structural Integrity, and Circular Economy of Sustainable Concrete Made with Recycled Aggregates and SCM Composites: Systematic Literature Review

The significant CO2 emissions from cement manufacturing and overuse of natural aggregates, especially river sand mining, have been a global environmental concern for decades. This is a review study that aimed to evaluate the solution by reviewing past studies on the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and recycled aggregates (RAs) to produce sustainable concrete (SC). Regarding environmental consequences, the results highlighted that the cement industry accounts for a 5–8% carbon footprint. Concurrently, the demand for high-quality river sand has escalated, leading to widespread river degradation, altered channel morphology, and effects on river ecosystems. Past studies’ experimental results indicate that silica fume (SF), as an effective SCM, enhances the strength and durability of sustainable concrete to its optimal levels. However, the higher RA content resulted in reductions in engineering properties. The published studies also reported that lower percentages of SF combined with RAs had a positive effect on the strength and durability of design mix concrete, thereby further strengthening the findings of this review. This factor was found to be missing in most studies. A cost–benefit analysis for combined SCMs and RAs was introduced in this study. This review study evaluated the cost–benefit analysis of 1 m3 of sustainable concrete. The highest benefit was observed at 20.97% in a study when optimized 10%SF + 100 RAs were combined. It showed that the combined use of SCMs with RAs at optimal levels satisfied the strength and durability requirements. In addition, the benefits of sustainable concrete were achieved without any cost increase, a new outcome revealed by this review.