DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.2010095 ISSN: 2636-8579
Artificial Intelligence integration in pediatric practice: pediatricians’ data-sharing boundaries, diagnosis-related use, ethical concerns, diagnostic procedures, and willingness to use secure institutional systems
Hüseyin Ilgın Bal, Dilek Dilli, Mehmet Tolga Köle, Yunus Emre Avcı Aims: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in healthcare, but its routine use by pediatricians remains unclear. This study examined the clinical and academic tasks for which pediatricians use AI, their willingness to use secure institutional systems, and the patient information they would enter. These dimensions were examined together to distinguish general acceptance of AI from task-specific use and willingness to share different types of patient information.Methods: This cross-sectional web-based survey included 302 pediatricians in Turkiye in June-July 2026. A 25-item questionnaire assessed task-specific AI use, ethical and professional concerns, institutional preparedness, willingness to use secure systems, and patient data-sharing preferences. Content validity was evaluated by 10 experts using a modified Lawshe approach. Data were summarized descriptively; Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman correlation analyses were performed. Demographic and professional analyses were exploratory.Results: Overall, 90.1% were willing to use a secure institutional AI system compliant with national data protection requirements, whereas fewer than 15% would enter directly identifying information such as patient names or file numbers. Clinical use was most common for medical information seeking (61.3%) and least common for preparing patient or family education materials (22.8%); 12.6% reported no clinical use. In academic work, literature searching and summarization was most frequent (68.9%), while project or grant applications were least frequent (7.6%); 11.6% reported no academic use. Older age was weakly associated with lower regular AI use (ρ=-0.192, p
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1145/3845995 2026
A Survey of LLM-based Software Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applications Boyang Yang, Zijian Cai, Fengling Liu, Bach Le, Lingming Zhang, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Yang Liu, Haoye Tian
-
DOI: 10.1108/jrim-02-2024-0074 2026
Cutting-edge research in social media and interactive marketing: a
review and research agenda James W Peltier, Andrew J Dahl, Lauren Drury, Tracy Khan
-
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336 2026
Knowledge hiding – a systematic review and research
agenda Amitabh Anand, Florian Offergelt, Payal Anand
-
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230448 2026
The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing Diego R. Känzig
-
DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10115 2026
Part 1: Assessment of upright restraint of broilers for head-only electrical stunning Troy J. Gibson, Georgina Limon, Shannon Campbell, Natalie Chancellor, Katharine A Fletcher, Paul Berry, Jeff Lines
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86 2026
MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86-r2.0 2026
Codebase release 2.0 for MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85 2026
svPITE: A Python package for the state-vector-based probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85-r1.1 2026
Codebase release 1.1 for svPITE Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.1177/02611929261494117 2026
The World Medical Association’s
Declaration of Helsinki
and
Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research
: Why reliable and valid preclinical evidence and Natalie Anderson, Jane Kotzmann, Rachel Smith, Kathrin Herrmann