Artificial Intelligence Automated Assessment of Colonoscopy Quality Metrics
Rajesh N. Keswani, Evandros Kaklamanos, Kristjana Kristinsdottir, Alex Heller, Matthew Wittbrodt, Mozziyar Etemadi, John E. PandolfinoBackground and Study Aims:
There is a significant intra-provider variability in colonoscopy performance but this is difficult to measure in routine practice. We describe an artificial intelligence tool (AI-CQ) that measures colonoscopy quality via analysis of recorded colonoscopy procedures and compare AI-CQ assessment of quality metrics with manual measurement in a large cohort of colonoscopists.
Patients and Methods:
Colonoscopy procedures were performed at one of two endoscopy locations at a single academic medical center. Select analyses were restricted to higher volume screening colonoscopists performing ≥100 screening or surveillance colonoscopies over the 11-month study period. Colonoscopy quality metrics were calculated from recorded colonoscopy videos using the AI-CQ tool and compared to manually calculated metrics (via nurse documentation) including adenoma detection rate (ADR) and withdrawal time (WT).
Results:
A total of 18,597 colonoscopy procedures performed by 55 unique attendings were recorded with 31 higher volume screening colonoscopists performing 12,456 screening or surveillance colonoscopies (median colonoscopist ADR 43.2%). AI-Insertion time (AI-IT) and AI-WT strongly correlated with manually calculated IT (r=0.60) and WT (r=0.91). AI-polyps per colonoscopy (AI-PPC) was 1.47 (SD ±0.54) and strongly correlated with ADR (0.54) and serrated detection rate (0.67). The AI-CQ accurately measured performance of any polypectomy and cold snare polypectomy with a mean cold snare polypectomy rate of 84.0% (range 63.0-95.3%).
Conclusions:
The AI-CQ can accurately measure commonly utilized quality metrics using recorded colonoscopy videos. Use of this AI tool provides a novel feasible approach to reliably measuring colonoscopy quality.