Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Predicting 1-Year Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sidhartha Gautam Senapati, Uday Shree Akkala Shetty, Yash Trivedi, Archit Srivastava, Priyanka Mohnani, Rupak Desai, Debabrata MukherjeeAbstract
The prediction of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is important in risk stratification, selection of patients, and the joint decision-making process. Conventional surgical and TAVR-specific risk scores have poor predictive ability, while artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models can provide better performance in capturing the complex nature of interdependencies between variables. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 protocol. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception to September 2025 for papers describing AI/ML models used in predicting mortality at 1 year following TAVR. The eligible papers reported either area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)/C-statistics with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) or had enough data for calculation. Papers that lacked comparable outcome measures, did not report on discrimination, or did not employ AI/ML methods were excluded from further analysis. The pooled estimates were estimated using the random-effects model. The risk of bias and applicability assessment was performed using PROBAST criteria. Four retrospective studies comprising 1,732 patients who underwent TAVR were included. ML-based gradient boosting and clustering were used as methods. The overall pooled estimate of AUC for 1-year mortality prediction was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71–0.81; p < 0.01) with considerable heterogeneity (I 2 = 64.76%, p = 0.04). Sensitivity analysis with the leave-one-out method showed consistent results for pooled estimates. AI/ML models proved their ability in predicting 1-year mortality following TAVR with moderate discrimination ability. Future research requires larger sample sizes in prospective studies.