Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Tunnel Construction Risk Management: A Review of Research Trends, Application Scenarios and Bottlenecks

As tunnel engineering continues to advance toward deeper, longer, and more complex projects, the risks encountered during the construction phase have evolved into a combination of various disaster types and the accumulation of multiple contributing factors. Traditional empirical and semi-empirical risk management methods are increasingly revealing shortcomings in terms of timeliness, accuracy, and the ability to process multi-source data. In recent years, driven by advancements in computing power and sensor technology, artificial intelligence algorithms (AI algorithms) such as machine learning and deep learning have been rapidly adopted in tunnel construction risk management. This paper retrieved relevant literature from the Web of Science database covering the period from 2010 to 2025. After rigorous screening, 96 highly relevant papers were selected for bibliometric analysis. This paper systematically reviews research progress from two perspectives: algorithmic models and engineering applications. The review indicates that, in terms of algorithmic models, traditional machine learning, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network, generative adversarial network, Transformer, and graph neural network constitute a multi-level technical framework encompassing feature representation, risk perception, and intelligent decision-making. In terms of applications, AI algorithms have been widely integrated into typical scenarios such as geological hazard identification and prediction, surrounding rock stability and deformation prediction, rock burst assessment and early warning, lining defect detection and structural safety assessment, construction-induced ground settlement prediction, and tunnel gas and fire hazard prediction, significantly enhancing risk identification and early warning capabilities. However, several challenges remain, including the scarcity of high-quality datasets, the prevalence of noisy, incomplete, and heterogeneous monitoring data, insufficient coupling between model interpretability and engineering mechanisms, limited cross-project transferability, and the lack of integrated management systems for multi-hazard lifecycle control. Based on this, this paper proposes future research directions in areas such as data infrastructure development, integration of mechanism constraints, and multi-hazard collaborative modeling, aiming to provide guidance for the further development of intelligent risk management in tunnel construction.