DOI: 10.1177/2325967126s00579 ISSN: 2325-9671

Are We All Seeing the Same Gaps while performing robotic TKA? An Inter-operator Variability Study

P. Meneguetti Filho, W.G. Lemos, T.V.D.O. Campos, M.L. Leite, R.S. Lazzarini, G.C. Rodrigues

Objectives:

To evaluate the inter-operator variability in manual ligament laxity assessment, specifically varus/valgus stress angles and medial/lateral gap measurements, during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) using the ROSA® Knee system, and to determine its impact on femoral component sizing agreement.

Methods:

In a comparative cross-sectional study, 21 patients underwent rTKA with the ROSA® Knee system. Two surgeons (lead surgeon and first assistant) independently performed anatomical landmark registration and gap assessments in extension (0°) and flexion (90°) under varus and valgus stress before ligament release. Absolute differences between measurements were calculated, and paired t-tests assessed statistical significance. Pearson correlation coefficients (R) evaluated agreement for stress angles and gap measurements. Cohen’s kappa determined inter-observer agreement for Artificial Intelligence ROSA® Knee system suggested femoral component size.

Results:

Strong correlations were found between operators for varus/valgus stress angles in extension (R=0.91 and 0.77, p<0.01) and flexion (R=0.46 and 0.53, p<0.05), and for medial/lateral extension gaps (R=0.59 and 0.52, p<0.01). However, no significant correlation was observed for medial/lateral flexion gaps (R=0.23 and 0.10, p>0.05). Mean discrepancies in stress angles ranged from 1.7° to 3.5°. Femoral component sizing showed substantial agreement (κ=0.70, 95% CI: 0.41–0.92).

Conclusion:

Inter-operator variability in manual gap assessment during rTKA is low in extension but significantly higher in flexion, likely due to inconsistent force application and the absence of a reproducible stop. Despite this variability, femoral component sizing agreement remains substantial. Standardized force application protocols and enhanced robotic feedback in flexion are recommended to improve reproducibility and surgical outcomes.

More from our Archive