DOI: 10.1111/avj.70110 ISSN: 0005-0423

Antimicrobial‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Australian wildlife admitted to a veterinary hospital

X Li, S Mowlaboccus, B Jackson, C Chang, M Rodgers, GW Coombs

Although antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing One Health concern, little is known about AMR in Staphylococcus aureus from Australian wildlife. This study investigated the occurrence, phenotypic AMR profiles, and genetic characteristics of S. aureus from six representative Australian wildlife species admitted to a wildlife hospital in Western Australia, including the western grey kangaroo ( Macropus fuliginosus ), quenda ( Isoodon fusciventer ), pelican ( Pelecanus conspicillatus ), galah ( Eolophus roseicapilla ), shingleback skink ( Tiliqua rugosa ) and long‐necked turtle ( Chelodina colliei ). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from 11.7% (21/180, 95% CI: 7.4%–17.3%) of the animals on admission. Whole genome sequencing identified 13 multi‐locus sequence types (STs) and various virulence factors, including the human‐specific immune evasion cluster (IEC). Resistance to at least one antimicrobial class was observed in 63.6% of the isolates. The blaZ , erm (T), aac(6)‐aph(2″), and tet (L) AMR genes were detected in 63.6%, 13.6%, 4.5%, and 4.5% of S. aureus , respectively. After 7 days of hospitalisation, S. aureus was isolated from 16.5% (16/97, 95% CI: 9.7%–25.4%) of the animals, including two methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from two pelicans. The two MRSA were identified as community‐associated MRSA clones ( mecA ‐positive ST1‐IV and ST93‐IV), suggesting direct or indirect transmission between humans and wildlife during hospitalisation may have occurred. This study highlighted Australian wildlife may be a potential reservoir for genetically diverse antimicrobial‐resistant S. aureus . AMR surveillance including wildlife using a One Health approach may be required.

More from our Archive