An Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Umbrella Review of Eating Disorder Meta-Analyses (2020–2025): Mapping Treatment Efficacy, Comorbidity, and Persistent Gaps in Sample Diversity
E. Caitlin Lloyd, Pablo Del Sol Calderon, Cate Morales, Euna Lee, Sarita Maharajh, Brooke Moorman, Daniel Le Grange, Kelsey Hagan, Sasha GorrellBackground/Objectives: Eating disorders (EDs) are serious psychiatric illnesses that result in physical and mental-health impairments. A unifying summary of the broad collection of ED research findings is lacking. This umbrella review leveraged artificial intelligence (AI) to summarize ED-focused meta-analyses, to identify directions for future research and treatment. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, and ProQuest were searched for meta-analyses of human ED research published between 1 June 2020 and 31 May 2025 (inclusive). A large language model (LLM) conducted risk of bias assessment and data extraction for studies meeting all inclusion criteria. Neural topic modeling (BERTopic) identified the themes present across included meta-analyses, and an LLM summarized findings of articles in each category. Results: 220 meta-analyses were included. AI tools demonstrated good accuracy in quality appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis (97%, 93%, and 96%, respectively). Most meta-analyses had at least one critical flaw (per AMSTAR 2 quality appraisal). Neural topic modeling identified 16 themes within the set of included articles: Neurocognition, Treatment Effectiveness, Intervention Efficacy, Biomarkers, Premorbid Conditions, Clinical Features, Epidemiology, Psychiatric Comorbidity, Behavioral Addictions, Long-Term Outcomes, Prevention, Psychological Factors, Treatment Gaps, COVID-19, Pharmacotherapy, and Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. Article summaries collectively identified ED prevalence of 1.69% and associations of EDs with mortality and disability. Studies covered a range of illness mechanisms and treatments, though disproportionately included Western females. Conclusions: This review highlights the broad scope but limited generalizability of ED research, as well as the potential of AI to accelerate systematic review workflows.