An Anatomy-Based Clinical Decision Framework for Precision Radiation Therapy of Peri-Optic Sellar and Parasellar Tumors
Alejandro Rodríguez-Camacho, Andrea Garcia-Bitar, Gerardo Yoshiaki Guinto-Nishimura, Emmanuel Polito-Salazar, Ximena Blasco, Juan Marcos Meraz-Soto, Jorge Alejandro Torres-Ríos, Julia Moscardini-Martelli, José Guillermo Flores-Vázquez, Laura Crystell Hernández-Sánchez, Miguel Ángel Celis-López, Guillermo Axayacalt Gutiérrez-Aceves, Sergio Moreno-JiménezIn peri-optic sellar and parasellar tumors, visual preservation requires protection from both radiation injury and progression of inadequately controlled disease. This structured narrative review synthesizes guidelines, systematic reviews, and clinical cohorts identified through targeted PubMed/MEDLINE searches updated through 22 August 2026, covering pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, craniopharyngiomas, and meningiomas. Predominantly retrospective evidence and inconsistent functional reporting limit comparisons between radiation modalities. We propose an anatomy-based framework integrating therapeutic intent, tumor–optic geometry, achievable target coverage, anatomical stability, prior treatment, and baseline visual and endocrine function. Minimum tumor–optic distance alone is insufficient for modality selection. Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery is suited to compact, stable targets when disease-specific coverage is achievable within organ-at-risk limits. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in three to five fractions may address focal peri-optic dose conflicts, whereas conventionally fractionated precision radiotherapy may accommodate broad contact, complex geometry, or dynamic cystic disease. Automated perimetry, optical coherence tomography, and axis-specific endocrine assessment support longitudinal surveillance; isolated retinal thinning does not establish radiation-induced optic neuropathy. New functional deficits require assessment of tumor status, treatment chronology, spatial dose, and competing causes. The proposed framework requires prospective validation and provides a practical basis for multidisciplinary decisions that jointly evaluate durable tumor control and long-term functional preservation.