An Alzheimer’s disease blood test study in a diverse community‐based population: Preliminary results from SEABIRD
Melody Li, Yan Li, Suzanne E. Schindler, Daniel Yen, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Ganesh M. Babulal, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Eric J. Lenze, Randall J. Bateman- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Neurology (clinical)
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Health Policy
- Epidemiology
Abstract
Background
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) blood tests are needed to aid in the evaluation of dementia, but the performance of these tests should be evaluated in diverse groups and real‐world settings. The goals of the Study to Evaluate Amyloid in Blood and Imaging Related to Dementia (SEABIRD) were to enroll 1120 participants to determine the participant acceptability and validity (relative to amyloid PET) of a plasma amyloid‐β 42/40 test in a diverse, community‐based sample of older adults, and explore the impact of important factors (age, race, education, cognition, APOE genotype, and medical conditions) on the blood test’s performance.
Method
SEABIRD measured plasma amyloid‐β 42/40 in a diverse population of older adults in the Saint Louis, Missouri, USA area. Participants completed a blood collection, cognitive screening (AD8® dementia screening interview and Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]), and a survey about their study experience and perceptions of the blood test. A subset of participants completed additional blood collection for reproducibility, amyloid PET and MRI for validation of the blood test, and the Clinical Dementia Rating® (CDR) for validation of the cognitive screening measures.
Result
Of the 859 participants enrolled in this ongoing study, 20.6% self‐identified as Black or African American and the percentage of APOE ε4 carriers was 30.2% (Table 1). Compared to the general population, SEABIRD participants were more likely to be female, aged 70‐79 years, and highly educated. They were less likely to report high cholesterol, diabetes, kidney disease, and stroke, and more likely to report depression. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for distinguishing cognitively unimpaired (CDR = 0) from cognitively impaired (CDR>0) individuals was 0.72 for the informant‐rated AD8, 0.46 for the self‐rated AD8, 0.70 for the MoCA, and 0.79 for the AD8/MoCA composite (Table 2). Survey results indicated that the blood test was well accepted (Figure 1), but it was perceived more positively by white and highly educated individuals.
Conclusion
A study of an AD blood test achieved rapid enrollment, broader diversity than typical AD cohorts, and high rates of participation. These results suggest that an AD blood test could be used for screening in a diverse clinical population.