In today’s world, private and government organizations are legally obligated to prioritize their information security. They need to provide proof that they are continually improving their cybersecurity compliance. One approach that can help organizations achieve this goal is implementing information security maturity models. These models provide a structured framework for measuring performance and implementing best practices. However, choosing a suitable model can be challenging, requiring cultural, process, and work practice changes. Implementing multiple models can be overwhelming, if possible. This article proposes a prioritization strategy for public institutions that want to improve their information security maturity. We thoroughly analyzed various sources through systematic mapping to identify critical similarities in information security maturity models. Our research led us to create the AIM (Awareness, Infrastructure, and Management) Triad. This triad is a practical guide for organizations to achieve maturity in information security practices.

More from our Archive

• DOI: 10.3390/app13158937 2023

  Structural Failures of Adobe Buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) Earthquakes

  Ercan Işık

• DOI: 10.3390/app13148502 2023

  Evaluation of YOLO Object Detectors for Weed Detection in Different Turfgrass Scenarios

  Mino Sportelli, Orly Enrique Apolo-Apolo, Marco Fontanelli, Christian Frasconi, Michele Raffaelli, Andrea Peruzzi, Manuel Perez-Ruiz

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0160579 2023

  Dispersion of expectorated cough droplets with seasonal influenza in an office

  Leslie K. Norvihoho, Hang Li, Zhi-Fu Zhou, Jing Yin, Shu-Yan Chen, Dong-Qing Zhu, Bin Chen

• DOI: 10.3390/app13158927 2023

  Fuzzy Logic with Deep Learning for Detection of Skin Cancer

  Sumit Kumar Singh, Vahid Abolghasemi, Mohammad Hossein Anisi

• DOI: 10.3390/app13158823 2023

  Debris Management in Turkey Provinces Affected by the 6 February 2023 Earthquakes: Challenges during Recovery and Potential Health and Environmental Risks

  Spyridon Mavroulis, Maria Mavrouli, Emmanuel Vassilakis, Ioannis Argyropoulos, Panayotis Carydis, Efthymis Lekkas

• DOI: 10.3390/app13158819 2023

  Operational Performance and Energy Efficiency of MEX 3D Printing with Polyamide 6 (PA6): Multi-Objective Optimization of Seven Control Settings Supported by L27 Robust Design

  Constantine David, Dimitrios Sagris, Markos Petousis, Nektarios K. Nasikas, Amalia Moutsopoulou, Evangelos Sfakiotakis, Nikolaos Mountakis, Chrysa Charou, Nectarios Vidakis

• DOI: 10.3390/app13158716 2023

  Vision Transformers for Anomaly Detection and Localisation in Leather Surface Defect Classification Based on Low-Resolution Images and a Small Dataset

  Antony Douglas Smith, Shengzhi Du, Anish Kurien

• DOI: 10.3390/app13148471 2023

  Current Options and Future Perspectives on Bone Graft and Biomaterials Substitutes for Bone Repair, from Clinical Needs to Advanced Biomaterials Research

  Vlad Al. Georgeanu, Oana Gingu, Iulian V. Antoniac, Horia O. Manolea

• DOI: 10.1063/5.0157622 2023

  Enhanced bio-fluids mixing by the soft polyelectrolyte layer-modulated electroosmotic vortices

  Dhananjay Kumar, Sumit Kumar Mehta, Pranab Kumar Mondal

• DOI: 10.3390/app13148393 2023

  Defect Detection in CFRP Concrete Reinforcement Using the Microwave Infrared Thermography (MIRT) Method—A Numerical Modeling and Experimental Approach

  Sam Ang Keo, Barbara Szymanik, Claire Le Roy, Franck Brachelet, Didier Defer