Advancing Near-Field Tsunami Fragility Modeling Through Structural Simulation and Post-Event Damage Observations
Mojtaba Harati, John W. van de LindtTsunami fragility modeling plays a central role in probabilistic coastal risk assessment; however, representing structural vulnerability under near-field tsunami conditions remains challenging due to complex hydrodynamic loading, strong spatial variability, and the presence of pre-existing earthquake damage. This paper advances near-field tsunami fragility modeling through three specific contributions, each bridging simulation-based methods and empirical damage survey observations. First, it demonstrates how a successive earthquake–tsunami simulation framework can generate conditional fragility surfaces that explicitly account for pre-existing seismic damage without relying on statistically intractable probabilistic decompositions. Second, it develops and validates a distance-dependent intensity-shifting approach—derived from analysis of the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami survey dataset—that adapts baseline fragility curves to near-field and near-coast conditions in a physically interpretable and practically deployable manner. Third, it establishes an explicit cross-validation pathway between simulation-derived fragility surfaces and empirical damage observations through machine-learning-assisted feature importance analysis, a connection largely absent from prior literature. Together, these contributions provide a physically consistent and data-informed foundation for near-field tsunami fragility modeling that is directly applicable—as a methodological framework—to loss and resilience estimation platforms such as IN-CORE and HAZUS and to risk-informed coastal infrastructure design in subduction-zone regions, subject to typology-specific calibration; the simulation results are demonstrated for a US Reinforced Concrete (RC) moment-frame archetype and the empirical results for Japanese wood-frame construction, so direct quantitative application to other structural typologies requires recalibration of the respective model components.