Addressing Biases in Analysis of Time of Infusion: NCI/SWOG Trial S1404 Among Participants With High-Risk Resectable Melanoma Who Received Adjuvant Anti–PD-1 Therapy
Megan Othus, Thach-Giao Truong, Elad Sharon, Kari Kendra, Kenneth Grossmann, Elizabeth Buchbinder, Nikhil I. Khushalani, Zeynep Eroglu, Sunandana Chandra, Gary C. Doolittle, John M. Kirkwood, Alexandra Ikeguchi, Catalin Mihalcioiu, C. Lance Cowey, Sunil A. Reddy, Douglas B. Johnson, Matthew Taylor, Vernon K. Sondak, Antoni Ribas, Sapna P. PatelPURPOSE
Multiple reports have suggested that receiving immunotherapy infusions earlier in the day is associated with improved outcomes, including longer overall survival (OS) and lower toxicity rates. However, the definition of early varies between publications. Reports also fail to account for confounding factors (including distance to infusion center), are subject to survivor bias (analyzing postbaseline factors at baseline), and do not adjust
METHODS
We analyzed a previously reported multicenter clinical trial evaluating pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for participants with resectable high-risk melanoma. Standard statistical methodologies that account for potential biasses were used to evaluate the association between time of day of infusion and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 628 participants received pembrolizumab and had time of first infusion recorded. The median age was 55 years, range, 20-82. Odds of infusion before 11:00 hours increased by 32% over 12 months of therapy (
CONCLUSION
In this multicenter trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab for participants with high-risk melanoma, analyses that account for common sources of bias found no significant association between recurrence-free or OS and time of day of infusion.