Abstract PR004: BTK A428D is a recurrent pan-resistance mutation to BTK degraders in clinical trials

Abstract

Early-phase clinical trials of BTK degraders in relapsed/refractory CLL have shown response rates of over 80%, including in patients with BTK mutations that confer resistance to conventional BTK inhibitors (BTKi). The molecular basis of resistance to BTK degraders is unknown and, given the promise of this class of drugs, would hold implications for therapy sequencing and the design of next-generation BTK degraders. To this end we identified five patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering who developed progressive disease while being treated on the phase 1 trials of zelebrudomide (NCT04830137, 4 patients) or bexobrutideg (NCT05131022, 1 patient). In two patients, one treated with zelebrudomide and the other with bexobrutideg, a pre-existing BTK A428D mutation had expanded at progression, rising from <1.5% at the start of treatment to >25%. In both cases, the increase in frequency of BTK A428D coincided with the loss of BTK degradation in peripheral blood B cells. No mutation in cereblon, the ligase utilized by these BTK degraders, was detected. To validate these clinical findings we generated wild-type and BTK A428D knock-in single-cell clones in TMD8 and HBL1 cells. BTK A428D conferred resistance to BTKi, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and pirtobrutinib, as well as the clinical-stage BTK degraders zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, BGB-16673, and AbbVie-1 (Compound 1, WO 2023183811). BTK A428D’s pan-resistance is unique compared to previously studied BTKi resistance mutations which remain susceptible to at least one BTKi and all clinical-stage BTK degraders tested. To understand how BTK A428D confers pan-resistance to BTKi and BTK degraders we conducted surface plasmon resonance studies which demonstrated that BTKi and all four clinical-stage BTK degraders tested are unable to bind BTK A428D. We next solved the crystal structure of apo BTK A428D to 1.8Å, which revealed that the mutant aspartate, which is larger and negatively charged compared to the wild-type alanine, sterically blocks BTKi and degraders from accessing residues in the hinge region of the kinase that are required for drug binding. We next asked why BTK A428D, despite conferring pan-resistance, has only been detected in 1.1% of patients treated with BTK inhibitors. Intriguingly, we noted that in one of our index patients, the frequency of BTK A428D declined and became undetectable after the withdrawal of zelebrudomide, suggesting a fitness defect. To assess this hypothesis, we compared the proliferation rates of five TMD8 wild-type and five BTK A428D single-cell clones; the BTK A428D clones grew more slowly and were consistently outcompeted in mixing studies. In summary, low-frequency BTK A428D mutations can expand under the selection pressure of BTK degraders and confer clinical resistance by preventing drug binding. The mutation, however, is outcompeted in the absence of BTK-targeted therapies. These findings provide rationale for the investigation of combination therapies and the development of next-generation BTK degraders capable of circumventing BTK A428D.