DOI: 10.4103/ijdr_2026372_abs_22 ISSN: 0970-9290

Abstract 3: Assessing faculty preparedness at ESI Dental College and Hospital for the integration of haptics and extended reality (XR) in dental education

Vartika Kathuria Monga, Mahesh Verma

Introduction:

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence enabled technologies like Extended Reality (XR), Virtual Reality and Haptic simulation is transforming dental education. They immerse the learners, making learning interactive and competency-based experience. However, for the implementation to be successful it largely depends on the preparedness, acceptance of the faculty and ability to integrate into the existing teaching practices. There has been paucity of literature in relation to the evidence on readiness of faculty in adopting AI driven technologies as educational tools in Indian context. Thus, this study was aimed to assess faculty preparedness and evaluate the impact of a targeted training workshop on their perceptions, confidence, and readiness to integrate XR and haptic technologies into dental education.

Objectives:

Assess the awareness of faculty in using haptic and XR technologies.

Identify barriers to adoption of XR technologies and haptics.

Assess the change in perception and readiness of dental educators following targeted training sessions on VR and haptic technologies.

Methodology:

This cross-sectional study involved administering pre- and post-training questionnaires through an online survey platform to align with sustainability goals, while the training itself was conducted in person. The ethical approval was obtained by the Institutional Review Board of GGSIPU.

Survey Instrument:

The content validity of the questionnaire was established through expert evaluation. The workshop was conducted by a trained faculty from London who is well experienced in using AR, VR, XR and Haptics. The workshop included information on the introduction to XR in Healthcare, its application and practical implementation strategies - Overview of challenges in adopting XR cost, accessibility).

Results:

46 pre and post completed questionnaires were analysed with 56.5% female and 43.5% male participants. A chi-square test was applied to assess the prior simulation experience among faculty. The result was statistically significant with p value less than 0.005, with 42% reporting prior exposure highlighting a significant baseline gap in simulation experience. Key barriers identified included lack of simulation resources (70%), insufficient trained educators (70%), and the high cost of technology. Over 85% of participants recognized training opportunities, institutional support, and availability of skilled educators as critical enablers. The findings revealed that 88% of participants reported improved understanding of XR and haptics post-training, motivated for further training and believed XR would enhance student engagement. 75% expressing confidence in incorporating the technology into their teaching.

Conclusion:

The study underscores a positive shift in faculty readiness and receptiveness toward the integration of XR and haptic technologies in dental education. By laying the groundwork for evidence-based curricular innovation, this pilot study offers valuable insights for advancing immersive technology integration and fostering international academic collaboration in the evolving landscape of dental education.

More from our Archive