DOI: 10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.13741 ISSN: 0009-7322

Abstract 13741: Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Inpatients With Atrial Fibrillation

Amneet Sandhu, Lisa Kaltenbach, Karen Chiswell, Vijay Shimoga, Carmel Ashur, Abby Pribish, Gregg C Fonarow, Jonathan P Piccini, Michael Ho, Paul D Varosy, Paul Hess
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Introduction: Among patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation (AF), the frequency of off-label direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing, associated factors, hospital-level variation, and temporal trends in contemporary practice are unknown.

Methods: Using the Get With The Guidelines® Atrial Fibrillation (GWTG-AF) registry, patients admitted from January 1 st , 2014 to March 31 st , 2020, and discharged on DOAC were stratified according to receipt of under, over, or recommended dose. Factors associated with off-label dosing were identified using logistic regression. Hospital-level variation and temporal trends were assessed.

Results: Of 22,470 patients prescribed a DOAC at discharge from hospitalization (66% apixaban, 29% rivaroxaban, 5% dabigatran), underdosing occurred among 2006 (8.9%), overdosing among 511 (2.3%), and recommended dosing among 19953 (88.8%). Patient factors associated with off-label use included age (underdosing: OR 1.06 per 1-year increase [95% CI 1.06-1.07] and overdosing: OR 1.07 per 1-year increase [1.06-1.09]), dialysis dependence (underdosing: OR 5.50 [3.76-8.05] and overdosing: OR 5.47 [2.74-10.88]), female sex (overdosing: OR 0.79 [0.63-0.99]) and weight (overdosing: OR 0.96 per 1-Kg increase [0.95-1.00]). Across hospitals, the adjusted median odds ratio for off-label DOAC use was 1.45 [95% CI 1.34-1.65] (underdosing: 1.52 [1.39-1.76] and overdosing: 1.32 [1.20-1.84]), indicating significant hospital-level variation. Hospital characteristics associated with underdosing included West vs. Northeast location (OR: 1.55 [1.04-2.31]), rural vs. urban setting (OR: 0.48 [0.28-0.83]), and number of beds (<200 vs. 500+, OR: 1.95 [1.29-2.95]). Recommended dosing significantly increased over time (81.9% in 2014 to 90.9% in 2020, p<0.0001 for trend) with a corresponding decline in under (14.4% in 2014 to 6.6% in 2020, p<0.0001 for trend) and overdosing (3.8% in 2014 to 2.5% in 2020, p=0.001 for trend).

Conclusion: One of 10 patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation is discharged on off-label dosing of DOAC with significant variation across hospitals. While the proportion of patients receiving recommended dosing has significantly improved over time, opportunities to improve DOAC dosing persist.

More from our Archive