A75-20 Analysis of Data From a Prospective Medicare Approved Clinical Trial Registry Indicates That Use of Maintenance Extracorporeal Photopheresis Is Independently Associated With Enhanced Survival of Lung Allograft Recipients Who Have Developed Lif
G J Despotis, R R Hachem, C A Hage, R Walia, H J Goldberg, M Patel, J M Reynolds, J Klesney-Tait, S M Arcasoy, C Naik, N De Simone, A Usmani, R E Girgis, F C Cordova, B C Keller, D R Nunley, A Javanbakht, J M Patil, M R Morrell, E A Lendermon, H J Huang, A Pelaez, A Emtiazjoo, K M Wille, K M Chan, G Yung, M A Baz, S Aryal, G Banez-Sese, S Vedantham, C Derfler, P Commean, K Berman, A Atkinson, J J Atkinson, A Prokudin, A D Betensley, D E ByersAbstract
Rationale
This Registry was designed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to arrest the rate of FEV1 decline (FEV1 decline) and prolong survival in lung allograft recipients with Bronchiolitis Obliterans refractory to standard of care therapy.
Methods
After IRB approval, 258 lung transplant recipients were enrolled from 20 US lung transplant centers. Subjects were assigned to ECP treatment (ECPRx) (i.e., 24 procedures over 6 months) at or a few months after enrollment based on spirometric criteria. Maintenance ECPRx (mECP) was at the discretion of managing clinicians. Rate of FEV1 decline in mL/month (FEV1 decline) was compared between 6 months prior to and 6 & 12 months after ECPRx initiation using linear mixed effects models. Time 0 for survival was set as the start of ECPRx for generation of Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (lower-upper) were generated using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression to characterize significant (p < 0.05) independent associations of mECP and/or any other covariates (i.e., demographic, operative, enrollment site, spirometric ) and survival.
Results
An 89% (78%-96%) decrease in the FEV1 decline was observed 12 months after ECPRx initiation in 191 participants assigned to ECPRx. FEV1 decline (-164 mL/month: 144-185) was greater (p < 0.001) in participants who expired within six months of Time 0 (n = 28) vs participants (-111 mL/month: 101-120) who died six months after Time 0 (n = 77). Of 159 participants who survived for at least six months after ECPRx initiation, 40 participants without mECP, who had up to 24 ECPRx (ECPRx: n = 19), had a lower survival HR: 2.43(1.75-3.4) (p < 0.001) relative to 119 participants who received mECP (ECPRx: n = 86)(see Figure). The response to ECPRx (% Change in FEV1 decline prior to and 6 months after 1st ECP) was similar between subcohorts (No mECP: -81 decrease vs mECP: -85%, p = 0.3). The association of mECP persisted after multivariate adjustment HR 1.8 (1.8-2.7)(p = 0.002) using significant covariates: FEV1 HR 0.37 (0.3-0.5), FEV1 decline HR 0.001 (0.001-0.04), Male Gender HR 2.4 (1.7-3.4); Reflux Disease HR 1.8 (1.2-2.8); Coronary Disease HR 1.8 (1.2-2.7).
Conclusions
This analysis indicates that mECP is independently associated with enhanced survival most likely due to attenuation of relapse six months after ECP initiation based on similar initial response to ECPRx. A risk-adjusted, control cohort is being pursued to facilitate submission of a scientifically rigorous petition to CMS to expand the ECP National Coverage Decision to include BOS predicated on CMS 2024 scientific guidelines.
This abstract is funded by: Therakos Inc