DOI: 10.1017/s0004972726101907 ISSN: 0004-9727
A NOTE ON TREE–CYCLE RAMSEY NUMBERS
TING HUANG, YANBO ZHANG, YAOJUN CHEN Abstract
Let
R
(
T
n
,
C
m
)
$R(T_n,C_m)$
upper R left parenthesis upper T Subscript n Baseline comma upper C Subscript m Baseline right parenthesis
denote the Ramsey number of a tree
T
n
$T_n$
upper T Subscript n
on
n
$n$
n
vertices versus a cycle
C
m
$C_m$
upper C Subscript m
of length
m
$m$
m
. Burr
et al.
[‘Ramsey numbers for the pair sparse graph–path or cycle’,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
269
(2) (1982), 501–512] asked for the least function
f
(
m
)
$f(m)$
f left parenthesis m right parenthesis
such that
R
(
T
n
,
C
m
)
=
2
n
−
1
$R(T_n,C_m)=2n-1$
upper R left parenthesis upper T Subscript n Baseline comma upper C Subscript m Baseline right parenthesis equals 2 n minus 1
for every odd
m
≥
3
$m\ge 3$
m greater than or equals 3
whenever
n
≥
f
(
m
)
$n\ge f(m)$
n greater than or equals f left parenthesis m right parenthesis
. They proved that
f
(
m
)
≤
756
m
10
$f(m)\le 756m^{10}$
f left parenthesis m right parenthesis less than or equals 756 m Superscript 10
. This bound was later improved to
25
m
$25m$
25 m
by Brennan [‘Ramsey numbers of trees versus odd cycles’,
Electron. J. Combin.
23
(3) (2016), Article no. P3.2] and to
4
m
−
8
$4m-8$
4 m minus 8
by Fan and Lin [‘Asymptotically optimal Ramsey goodness of sparse graphs versus odd cycles and paths’, Preprint, 2025, arXiv:2507.11835v5]. In this note, we show that
f
(
m
)
≤
2
m
−
4
$f(m)\le 2m-4$
f left parenthesis m right parenthesis less than or equals 2 m minus 4
by using a different method and conjecture that
f
(
m
)
=
⌈
(
2
m
−
1
)
/
3
⌉
$f(m)=\lceil (2m-1)/3\rceil $
f left parenthesis m right parenthesis equals left ceiling left parenthesis 2 m minus 1 right parenthesis divided by 3 right ceiling
.